PCNL: understanding the beauty of the supine position
نویسنده
چکیده
Cent European J Urol. 2017; 70: 68 doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1316 Having received the opportunity to add my comments to this outstanding editorial represents for me a great honour and pleasure for two reasons. First, Dr. Giusti is a prominent figure in endourology and an enthusiastic teacher of supine PCNL, therefore forming an ideal academic partnership with Dr. Proietti in propagating this procedure around the world has been a truly outstanding experience. Secondly, Dr. Giusti served as my mentor in implementing supine PCNL. I could even say that I fell in love with this procedure at first sight. It has not only been the curiosity, but has been the challenge of implementing a new approach. I have performed almost one thousand prone PCNLs and have had to combat with several issues such as: long hours of bending over while in a standing position over the patient, while bearing the weight of a lead apron on my shoulders, changing the patient’s position during the operation, arguing with the anaesthesiologist about access to the patient’s airway and monitoring devices, performing additional percutaneous accesses in certain cases and puncturing supracostally with the subsequent inevitable pleural complications in order to treat staghorn stones. I have understood that it can be done differently, and that Valdivia et al. [1]. solved those problems in an ingenious way. Once I had performed my Mario Sofer
منابع مشابه
Supine PCNL is the way to go!
The fact that operating a patient in the supine position is easier than in a prone position is rather intuitive: apart from PCNL and, obviously, spinal surgery, there is no surgery of retroperitoneal organs performed in the prone position. So, why is it that nowadays PCNL is performed in the supine position only in 20% of cases worldwide? [1]. Indeed, the prone position was adopted in the pione...
متن کاملProne versus Modified Supine Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Prospective Randomized Study
OBJECTIVE To perform a prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine positions. METHODS Between August 2010 and August 2011, 102 patients with renal calculi and 20 patients with ureteral calculi were randomized to undergo fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided PCNL procedures in the prone or modified supine po...
متن کاملWhat is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – Prone or supine? A systematic review
OBJECTIVE To review the literature reporting the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and outcomes for prone and supine PCNL, as PCNL is an established treatment for renal calculi and both prone and supine PCNL have been described, but there has been much debate as to the optimal position for renal access in PCNL. METHODS A review of the medical literature was conducted using the ...
متن کاملSupine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro.
PURPOSE To share the experience of the authors with the urological family in the world by the review of literature on supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS We have searched all the available databases, including PubMed or MEDLINE and Embase Biomedical Database to find any English articles related to supine PCNL from 1998 to 2010. Of 17 studies, 11 were case series ...
متن کاملPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience
OBJECTIVES To assess the outcomes of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a modified supine position, more feasible for surgeons, anaesthetists, and operating theatre staff, as well as for the patient himself, and evaluating it in comparison to the standard prone position. PATIENT AND METHODS A retrospective, case-control study was conducted between January 2011 and December 2015...
متن کامل